Ok by me.

On 22 October 2014 14:20, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok, thanks. I agree with both yours and Garth's comments. The original
> form should be the default choice.
>
> I'll be adding the new form to the web archive (but without an
> explicit link).
>
> --
> Anders
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0100, David Ham wrote:
> > I agree with Garth. Legally it's fine, you just have to make sure that
> you
> > don't forget about the end date if the institution keeps contributing.
> >
> >
> > On 16 October 2014 18:38, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >     I have received a patch from a contributor whose employer is not able
> >     to sign the institution copyright consent form other than for a
> >     limited period of time. (The time limitation is for the period of
> >     contribution, not for the period of the validity of the license which
> >     is indefinite.) I have therefore prepared a suggestion for a limited
> >     version of the institution copyright consent form:
> >
> >     http://www.math.chalmers.se/~logg/tmp/letter-institution-limited.pdf
> >
> >     Does this look ok? Can we add this as a possible alternative for
> >     institutions to sign?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> fenics mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to