On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:19:53 -0600 Michael Sacks <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > One question I have is what is the best way you guys do Numerical > Integration. Quadrature schemes used for generating element assembly code are defined in https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/ffc/src/f4a1847772b0f35514cd5bc9ea65fa51fe6505ce/ffc/quadrature_schemes.py?at=master Jan > Our constitutive models utilize multiple integrals and we generally > use GQ with various tweaks for this. > Are there better methods? > > -MSS > > On 3/2/15 9:15 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Miroslav Kuchta > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I wrote a simple script which shows how FEniCS can be used to > >> solve integral equations. At the moment FEniCS is combined with > >> numpy to solve the problem, so I’d be grateful for pointers on how > >> to solve the entire problem in FEniCS. Also, are there any > >> objections to this becoming a demo at some point? Thanks. > >> > > uBLAS is slated to removed at some point, so it would be better if > > it didn't depend on uBLAS. > > > > My other concern is that it's maybe more a NumPy demo than a FEniCS > > demo - the use of FEniCS in the demo is (understandably) pretty > > limited. > > > > An option would be to paste it on the Q&A forum under a question > > 'How do I solve . . . '. > > > > Garth > > > >> Best regards, Miro > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> fenics-support mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics-support > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > fenics mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
