On 15 June 2015 at 19:47, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
> MeshGeometry::x(std::size_t n) means give me the x-coordinate for vertex n.
Nope, the full signature is
double* MeshGeometry::x(std::size_t n);
so it gives a pointer to the coordinate values of vertex n.
Garth
> Shouldn't that still be supported, irrespective of implementation details?
>
> --
> Anders
>
> mån 15 juni 2015 kl 18:34 skrev Chris Richardson <[email protected]>:
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I've been looking at:
>>
>>
>> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/fenics-developer-tools/wiki/Parameterized_geometries
>>
>> today.
>>
>> It seems like it might be a good idea to rewrite the interface to
>> MeshGeometry in some way.
>> If the geometry is going to be stored as xxxxxxyyyyyyzzzzzz etc instead
>> of xyzxyzxyzxyz etc,
>> or perhaps in some other unspecified way internally, then it makes sense
>> to start deprecating
>> methods such as MeshGeometry::x(std::size_t n), which rely on a specific
>> internal data ordering - and to do it for this release... any opinions?
>>
>> Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> fenics mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fenics mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
