On 20 August 2015 at 16:02, Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:39 PM Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 20 August 2015 at 15:21, Martin Sandve Alnæs <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The iteration number assertions that keep failing here:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://fenicsproject.org:8010/builders/dolfin-master-full-trusty-amd64-py3
>>> http://fenicsproject.org:8010/builders/dolfin-master-full-wheezy-amd64
>>>
>>> Are they caused by old petsc?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I expect.
>>
>
> These buildbots have PETSc version 3.4, which is the minimum required
> version in CMakeLists.txt and the latest version available in
> Debian/Ubuntu. I do not think anyone is working on updating PETSc in
> Debian, so I will probably have to do that if we decide to drop support for
> 3.4, which is fine by me.
>

If we can query the PETSc version at runtime, we can skip the tests for
older versions.

In practice, anyone who needs PETSc should be building (the latest) PETSc
from source. The Eigen backend provides all the basics for a user that
wants to solve smallish problems in serial.

Garth


>
> Johannes
>
> Garth
>>
>>
>>
>>> Should the buildbots be upgraded?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fenics mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> fenics mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>>
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to