On 1 October 2015 at 12:41, Martin Sandve Alnæs <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've used it in the new dijitso module for mpi awareness in jit. I don't > want that to depend on dolfin. I think it's possible to work around, I can > consider other options. > If you only need a few calls, I think it's fine to wrap them and to make mpi4py a dijitso dependency in parallel. Garth > 1. okt. 2015 12:54 skrev "Garth N. Wells" <[email protected]>: > >> >> On 1 October 2015 at 11:33, Martin Sandve Alnæs <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Ok, what about requiring it iff mpi is present? >>> >> >> It does mean checking before using it, which can be untidy and makes it a >> sort of 'half-dependency'. >> >> Is there something in particular you want to use in mpi4py? >> >> Garth >> >> >> >>> 1. okt. 2015 11:59 skrev "Garth N. Wells" <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> >>>> On 1 October 2015 at 10:44, Martin Sandve Alnæs <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Can we make mpi4py a required dependency for fenics? Any reasons not >>>>> to? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> To keep it simple, I presume it would mean making MPI a dependency for >>>> FEniCS (?), which is not presently the case. >>>> >>>> Garth >>>> >>>> >>>>> Martin >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> fenics mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
