Dear Anders, Thank you for you contibution! I have updated the table it is still available at GitHub.
Thre is now also an export to html, it looks to be quite nice http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/kostyfisik/FEA-compare/blob/master/table.html (sorry, I messed a header a little bit and was not able to find a solution fast) Best regards, Kostya ср, 14 окт. 2015 г. в 17:02, Anders Logg <[email protected]>: > Looks like a useful comparison. Here are some suggestions: > > Documentation: Tutorial, demos, 700-page book > > Remove win from Binary since it that's only for an old version. > > Elements: Add quads and hexes since this has been added recently (Chris > and Martin can comment) > > Mapping: Any order or only isoparametric? (Martin can comment) > > Mesh generation: Yes, Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) supported via mshr > (CGAL and Tetgen used as backends) > > Mesh input/output: XDMF (and FEniCS XML) > > Mesh adaptive refinement: Only h > > Elements: all simplex elements in the Periodic Table (femtable.org), any > order > > Output format: VTK (.pvd, .vtu) and XDMF/HDF5 > > Boundary elements solver: no > > Used libs: PETSc, TPetra, Eigen > > This is a start, once you put this into a table and present it, I think > myself and others can add more comments. One could also list features like > mesh intersections (collision testing), function spaces defined over > multiple non-matching meshes, and automatic mesh partitioning. > > -- > Anders > > > mån 12 okt. 2015 kl 09:11 skrev Konstantin Ladutenko < > [email protected]>: > >> Dear all, >> >> I would like to make a comparison of available FEM software, FEniCS looks >> to be kind of must have in a such kind of comparison. >> >> I created a simple Python script to generate a feature comparison table >> (in org-mode format for ease of export) from a set of profiles >> https://github.com/kostyfisik/FEA-compare >> I have filled a number of keys for deal.ii, libMesh, and FEniCS. Could >> you please check the correctness of FEniCS profile and, probably, fill the >> fields I was not able to find out fast. Any new features that should be >> mentioned in a such comparison are really wanted, feel free to add new >> lines to profile in format >> >> generic feature description : details relevant to FEniCS >> >> Fill free to provide pull requests at GitHub >> >> Manual export to Google Doc for ease of view was done >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sOJj1IrLZu4AGW8V6dhBFyz6CZN1XAxC0oVxEOx383U/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> Best regrads, >> Konstantin Ladutenko, >> Junior research fellow, >> ITMO University >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
