There doesn't seem to be any overwhelming pressure to change the notation from a(v, u) to a(u, v). More opinions?
In summary, the options are: 1. Keep a(v, u) so that A_ij = a(phi_i, phi_j) 2. Change to a(u, v) and do some kind of swapping of indices 3. Change to a(u, v) and change to A_ij = a(phi_i, phi_j) Option 3 seems unreasonable (although one could argue this is where the problem lies, columns should be numbered first). -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
