On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 23 April 2013 22:10, Johan Hake <hake....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Do we have a buildbot testing the next branch? >> > > If we have the resources, it would be good to test both master and > next, with the intention that master is almost always green, and next > we try to keep green but not minding if it sometimes fails.
This should work fine. I have added next to the buildbot now. On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> wrote: >>> One thing I would suggest now is that core developers publish branches >>> they intend to merge as part of the main repositories (as opposed to >>> storing them in personal repositories). It makes it easier for others >>> to follow the development. Note e.g. that PETSc has 66 branches at the >>> moment. Examples would be the UFL repository which could have the >>> following branches: >>> >>> master >>> next >>> martinal/subdomains >>> martinal/signatureopt >>> logg/tuplenotation ;-) This will make it easy to test a specific branch on the buildbot. Simply select a builder, enter the branch name and press the force build button. Johannes _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : fenics@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
