if it would be of any help to you and you've got the time to make some preperations you might send me a test.sql (or migration) with a little testdata and your essential AR-models. Then I may test it on a windows box and we are able to compare the results...
cheers,
Jan
On 5/25/06, Jan Prill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Marcus,
as you may read in http://ferret.davebalmain.com/trac/wiki/MyFirstBenchmark the indexing of 408MB project gutenberg files took around 1min. To give you an impression of the indexing speed.
I haven't got the time right now to test the performance on a windows box and with cFerret. Maybe anyone else is possible to jump in. but 15 seconds for this document is obviously strange.
cheers,Jan
On 5/25/06, Marcus Andersson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:More testing:
This document (with several fields in it) took 15 seconds to index:
Field: new item
Field: Presentationsmaterial
Field: Ppt-presentationer
Field:
Field: new item
Field: new item
Field: new item
A bit long for that little content if you ask me. I have several similar
documents that take a lot of time ("new item" is an ugly default value
that all content items get from the beginning, don't ask me why, does it
affect indexing speed when a lot of documents contains similar tokens?).
But, I don't know. I'm using the Ruby version. That is supposed to be
slow. Maybe the super fast C implementation should take 150ms to handle
a document of this size? What affects indexing speed?
Regards,
Marcus
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/ .
_______________________________________________
Ferret-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
_______________________________________________ Ferret-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
