On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:04 +0200, Jens Kraemer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 03:44:40PM +0100, Pedro Côrte-Real wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 16:11 +0200, Jens Kraemer wrote: > > > yes, this feature is only in svn trunk at this time. The API docs are > > > generated from trunk automatically, maybe we should fix this and keep > > > the docs for each version we release. > > > > Are you also going to fix this for the next version? There's a patch > > attatched that I am using, although the code is a little hackish. > > Without it sorting results seems impossible. > > > > http://projects.jkraemer.net/acts_as_ferret/ticket/9 > > I think you speak of this one - > http://projects.jkraemer.net/acts_as_ferret/ticket/20
Yes, although the one I posted was a similar issue. Messed up when looking for my bugreport. > this will be fixed in the soon-to-be-released next version. Cool. I hate having non-standard patches to stuff. It would also be cool to have a cleaner API to do sorting than the ferret one. One that uses the field names passed to acts_as_ferret. Ferret is great but it's API seems to be too much like Java and not like most ruby API's. I ended up building a small class to encapsulate searching for my rails model to hide all that away. Pedro. _______________________________________________ Ferret-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
