On 7/16/06, Jordan Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/15/06, David Balmain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To force it to use the pure ruby version require 'rferret' instead of
> > 'ferret'. Alternatively (I should have mentioned this the first time)
> > you can use a QueryFilter. For example;
> >
> > filter = QueryFilter.new(TermQuery.new(Term.new("subject", "sport")))
> >
> > You should be able to build pretty much any filter you need just like
> > that. Hope that helps.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dave
> >
> > PS: The fix can't be checked out of svn yet. I still have a lot of
> > work to do. Sorry.
> Don't apologize man, you've done an exceptional job with it so far.
> The filter I was trying to add would filter based on location, so I'm
> not sure that It could be done easily using a query-filter. It takes a
> latitude, longitude, and radius, then filters for records that are
> with the radius...think that's doable with the builtin filters? I
> guess I could do it with a bounding box instead, but I'd prefer to
> keep it accurate...Anyways, I'll try the rferret route for now, and
> hopefully by the time this application goes to production, the c
> version will be fixed up. Thanks for your help.
That is a perfect example of what you can't use the QueryFilter for. I
may even use it as an example in the documentation. Thanks and good
luck with the pure Ruby version.
Cheers,
Dave
_______________________________________________
Ferret-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
