David Balmain wrote: > On 8/5/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The application should be 99.9% about reading so hopefully the >> performance hit won't be significant. I'll have to test and see. Cheers >> Dave. > > Cool. If that solution doesn't work you can write a simple server > using DRb that takes indexing requests.
Or use a background process that updates the index for changed records (updated_at > last update timestamp) periodically. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ Ferret-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
