FYI, it is a long time known issue between Java Lucene and NFS  
mounted file systems.  There is actually quite a bit of active work  
going on in this space in the Java Lucene community.

        Erik


On Sep 17, 2006, at 7:07 AM, Jens Kraemer wrote:

> Hi!
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 12:53:48PM +0200, Sebastien Hugues wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I use ferret 0.10.4 whith shared index over NFS directory.
>> There are 2 applications servers. The web server is Mongrel 0.3.13.3
>> and mongrel_cluster 0.2.0. There are 20 Mongrel processes on each
>> server.
>>
>> Each time my application update a model, Mongrel process
>> stops running with this errro in its log:
>>
>> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.10.4/lib/ferret/index.rb:663:
>> [BUG] Segmentation fault
>>
>> Theses servers are serving a lot of requests. Is it good to have
>> shared NFS index ? Is there a lock problem ?
>
> Possible that there are locking problems. We had this question come up
> some days ago on the list, hope Dave can shed some light on this.
>
> I'm working on remote indexing capabilities for acts_as_ferret right
> now. Atm I have a little drb server that does the indexing/searching,
> and an experimental branch of acts_as_ferret that can talk to this
> server.
> So you'd only have one index and both machines talking to this.  
> Drop me
> line if you're interested in a solution like this.
>
>
> Jens
>
>
>
> -- 
> webit! Gesellschaft für neue Medien mbH          www.webit.de
> Dipl.-Wirtschaftsingenieur Jens Krämer       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Schnorrstraße 76                         Tel +49 351 46766  0
> D-01069 Dresden                          Fax +49 351 46766 66
> _______________________________________________
> Ferret-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk

_______________________________________________
Ferret-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk

Reply via email to