You are right. I upgraded aaf too. Not sure what the earlier version was
but when I upgraded I got 'svn revision 132' for aaf.
Sorry I should have mentioned that.
Thanks
Jens Kraemer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 02:26:50PM +0100, Raj Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>> My question is this:
>> Now that I do Event.rebuild_index I get {} in return. Is that okay? Or
>> does that mean something is wrong somewhere?
>
> As of now, the return value of rebuild_index does not mean anything and
> has changed between aaf versions. In 0.3.0, index.close() was the last
> call
> in the method, in 0.3.1 it's been an assignment to Hash.new, so {} looks
> like
> a correct return value for this version.
>
> However I don't see how the return value should change from false to {}
> without switching the aaf version.
>
> Jens
>
> PS: I promise to set the return value of rebuild_index to something
> meaningful (maybe the number of records indexed?) in future versions, as
> people really seem to pay attention to it ;-)
>
> --
> webit! Gesellschaft f�r neue Medien mbH www.webit.de
> Dipl.-Wirtschaftsingenieur Jens Kr�mer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Schnorrstra�e 76 Tel +49 351 46766 0
> D-01069 Dresden Fax +49 351 46766 66
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_______________________________________________
Ferret-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
