I did some further testing using the DRb setup. This time, I kept the sort but removed the :limit and :offset options. The results were not properly sorted and only 10 items were returned, even though there are 48 matching results and no limit imposed on the query. Then I removed the DRb from the setup and the 48 results came back properly sorted in a single query.
Sanjay Sanjay Kapoor wrote: > I'm using 1.1.6 using acts_as_ferret and DRb. It seems to work for > basic queries, but I've run into a problem when using sorting and using > the :limit and :offset options for pagination. I find that the query > results are no longer sorted by the sort field, and I seem to get the > same results irrespective of the :limit and :offset parameters. If I > don't sort the results, the :limit and :offset parameters work as > expected when using DRb. > > When I removed DRb from the setup, the sorting and pagination options > work as expected. Has anyone else come across this problem? > > Sanjay > > Jens Kraemer wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 08:59:26AM +0100, donut donut wrote: >>> Jens Kraemer wrote: >> [..] >>> > >>> > I wrote some documentation to get you started with the remote indexing >>> > stuff at >>> > http://projects.jkraemer.net/acts_as_ferret/wiki/DrbServer >>> > >>> >>> Hi, thanks for the great work! Does this work with Rails 1.1.6 as I >>> haven't made the switch to 1.2.1 yet? >> >> I didn't test with 1.1.6 but it should work. >> >> Jens >> >> -- >> Jens Kr�mer >> webit! Gesellschaft f�r neue Medien mbH >> Schnorrstra�e 76 | 01069 Dresden >> Telefon +49 351 46766-0 | Telefax +49 351 46766-66 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.webit.de >> >> Amtsgericht Dresden | HRB 15422 >> GF Sven Haubold, Hagen Malessa -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ Ferret-talk mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
