On 17/02/2012 at 11:41 +0800, Siu Meng Lei wrote: > Thank you for you suggestion. > And also I have one more question, after I follow the step, I found > that the final output quality is but. > It mentions that Getting good pitchmarks is important to the quality > of the synthesis, and I review the information in this web site: > http://festvox.org/bsv/x862.html, and compare my .pm file, the graph > is very different, see here http://i43.tinypic.com/28i450h.png, > there are many red lines, and I open my .pm file, the content is sth > like that: > > > EST_File Track > DataType ascii > NumFrames 466 > NumChannels 0 > NumAuxChanels 0 > BreaksPresent true > file_type 14 > EST_Header_End > 0.010042 1 > 0.020083 1 > 0.030125 1 > 0.040188 1 > 0.050229 1 > 0.060271 1 > ...... > ...... > > > Is my .ps file correct? Since there are too many pitch mark..... if > not correct, how can I fix it? > Actually I have edit the script bin/make_pm_wave, but the output is > still bad.
Pitchmarks are good Graph use different because you only added spectrum pane, not waveform pane. You can add waveform pane with the right click Your spectrum shows that your speech is not properly recorded. It's not 16khz but 11khz original. You will not be able to build a voice from it flawlessly unless you will modify the extraction parameters.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Festlang-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/festlang-talk
