On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:21:12PM +0100, Marie Rognes wrote: > Kristian Oelgaard wrote: > > > > > >2010/1/20 <[email protected]>: > >>------------------------------------------------------------ > >>revno: 1494 > >>committer: Marie E. Rognes <[email protected]> > >>branch nick: ffc-unstable > >>timestamp: Wed 2010-01-20 21:43:48 +0100 > >>message: > >> Somewhat evil and dead-slow (but very useful!) testing of generated > >> element and dofmap code. A lot of stuff fails, including: > >> > >> (a) element_map fails for mixed elements (-> AL) > >> (b) generated evaluate_basis_derivatives code does not compile (-> KBO) > > > >I just pushed a bug fix that should? fix this. > > Still fails for BDM/RT. Note that for the piola mapped elements it might > be easier to use format["J"] and format ["inv(J)"] directly than the > format["transform"]. (The latter constantly confuses me with regard to > indices for dx/dX and dX/dx). Also detJ has been given an extra_ > (by someone?)
Maybe the extra _ is not necessary. Feel free to remove it. -- Anders > There is a doc-string in _change_variables in evaluatedof.py > on how the Piolas should work in case reminding is useful.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
