On 21/01/2010 14:19, Kristian Oelgaard wrote: > > > 2010/1/21 <[email protected]>: >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> revno: 1502 >> committer: Marie E. Rognes <[email protected]> >> branch nick: ffc-unstable >> timestamp: Thu 2010-01-21 15:13:40 +0100 >> message: >> Fixes for covariant piola. Marie finally remembered why it should be >> (j, i) instead of (i, j). > > Cool, I guess this means that the indices is based on some theory after > all :)
Would the reason why the covariant Piola map doesn't contain a det(J) but the contravariant Piola does be clarified on reading RognesKirbyEtAl2009? Harish _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
