Anders Logg wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:42:46AM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote: >> Shouldn't we have both 'tensor' and 'quadrature' references like we >> had in the old FFC? Also, before these references can be trusted, >> we need to check that the new code will give the same result as >> simple_verify_tensors in the old FFC. >> >> Kristian > > I've been thinking about this and I think we can actually have just > one set of references for the demos. Then the representation will be > the one chosen by _auto_select_representation. That will simplify a > great deal. > > But the new regression test will also support having a bunch of forms > to test which are not necessarily demos. We can have a file named > forms.py which contains a bunch of extra forms to test and in those we > can select both representations. This will lead to generation of two > different references, like FooTensor.h and FooQuadrature.h and all > these references can be thrown into the same directory. >
Why bother then with regression tests for the demos? Or just add all the demos to the test forms. > This will be simpler than having to iterate over different > representations as part of the testing framework. Now we can just > iterate over a bunch of form files. > Isn't iterating over different representations easy? Just a change in the flag. Garth > And yes, we need to check against the old simple_verify_tensors. I'll > be working on that. > > -- > Anders > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
