Nice, I will update the references. -- Anders
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:32:17PM -0000, [email protected] wrote: > ------------------------------------------------------------ > revno: 1576 > committer: Marie E. Rognes <[email protected]> > branch nick: ffc-unstable > timestamp: Tue 2010-01-26 13:28:46 +0100 > message: > Updated ufctest to give more correct values for > interpolate_vertex_values. Could some update references? (Marie is a > bit unsure about her ufl/ffc setup.) > > It seems that now only MixedPoisson fails for > interpolate_vertex_values (which it should because the old one is > wrong.) > modified: > test/regression/ufctest.h > > > === modified file 'test/regression/ufctest.h' > --- test/regression/ufctest.h 2010-01-26 09:10:52 +0000 > +++ test/regression/ufctest.h 2010-01-26 12:28:46 +0000 > @@ -268,15 +268,19 @@ > } > > // evaluate_dof > + double* copies = new > double[element.space_dimension()*value_size*derivative_size]; > for (uint i = 0; i < element.space_dimension(); i++) > - print_scalar("evaluate_dof", element.evaluate_dof(i, f, c), i); > + { > + copies[i] = element.evaluate_dof(i, f, c); > + print_scalar("evaluate_dof", copies[i], i); > + } > > // evaluate_dofs > element.evaluate_dofs(values, f, c); > print_array("evaluate_dofs", element.space_dimension(), values); > > // interpolate_vertex_values > - element.interpolate_vertex_values(vertex_values, values, c); > + element.interpolate_vertex_values(vertex_values, copies, c); > print_array("interpolate_vertex_values", (c.topological_dimension + > 1)*value_size, vertex_values); > > // num_sub_dof_elements >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
