Anders Logg wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:26:32AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: >> >> Anders Logg wrote: >>> There seem to be just a couple of issues remaining in order of importance: >>> >>> 1. QuadratureElement >>> >>> 2. DOLFIN fem unit test >>> >>> 3. evaluate_basis_derivatives >>> >>> 4. RestrictedElement >>> >>> Among these, I would say 1-2 are crucial to fix before 0.9.0, >>> but 3-4 are less crucial. >>> >> Both 3 and 4 are crucial for me.. > > I know, but I expect you are part of category (i) below, a limited > number of users who are running bzr tip anyway. :-) >
Not exactly, because I share some solvers which require this functionality with less adventurous collaborators who do use the packages. Garth >> I think that it's all being rushed. With the major re-write of FFC it >> should be given some time for user testing. I would be amazed if my >> various solvers do not show up bugs. > > Yes, it's being rushed, but there is time to release bug fixes. > > To me, the minimum requirement is that we pass the regression tests in > FFC (perhaps except for evaluate_basis_derivatives and > ElementRestriction) and that we can compile and run all the DOLFIN > demos without problems. That should be enough for 0.9.0. > > Even so, I'm not sure we will be able to manage to do that in time. > We should settle on something before lunch today. If we decide not to > press on with the release, we should take a good look at which > versions are currently packaged and see if those packages are in good > shape since those will go into the next Ubuntu LTS. > > -- > Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ffc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ffc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
