Fergus Henderson wrote: > On 29-May-2001, Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ "" implies <> ] > > It does. > > > I'm not sure about this, although it's guaranteed > > the other way round IIRC. > > You recall incorrectly. [...] Well, at least I had a 50-50 chance! :-} OK, then let's auto-wrap... Cheers, S. -- Sven Panne Fon: +49/89/99567000 Fax: +49/89/99567461 BetaResearch GmbH, Betastr. 1, D-85774 Unterfoehring mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.betaresearch.de _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Fergus Henderson
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Fergus Henderson
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Fergus Henderson
- RE: Again: FFI Syntax Simon Marlow
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Sven Panne
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Sven Panne
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Fergus Henderson
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Sven Panne
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Again: FFI syntax Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Again: FFI syntax Simon Marlow
- RE: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Michael Weber
- Re: Again: FFI syntax Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Again: FFI syntax Simon Marlow