01 Jun 2001 13:35:40 -0600, Alastair David Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> Even if rarely used, I think it is easier to teach people to use
> it if we say there are two forms of definition (safe and unsafe,
> static and dynamic, etc.)
But there are not two forms. With the new proposal you import
either an explicitly named thing or an automagically generated
converter Haskell->FunPtr or an automatically generated converter
FunPtr->Haskell.
They are not orthogonal attributes. The latter forms are like special
cases of the first form.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^ SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA
QRCZAK
_______________________________________________
FFI mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
