On 18-Jun-2001, Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manuel wrote:
> > [...] I'd prefer to complicate the ccall entity description
> > slightly and go for
> >
> > foreign import ccall "myheader.h foo@mylib" foo :: Int -> Int
> >
> > [...] Any objections?
>
> I'd favour this, too. Just a very minor note: If there is a "::"-syntax
> for this already on .NET, we should adopt this instead of "@". I'm not
> sure about this or similar lexical conventions on other platforms, though.
.NET is a runtime platform, it doesn't really have any syntax.
There is a convention for using "." for namespace separators that is
pretty much baked into the system. But apart from that, there's no
syntax save what programming languages decide upon.
--
Tyson Dowd #
# Surreal humour isn't everyone's cup of fur.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] #
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~trd #
_______________________________________________
FFI mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
