"Simon Peyton-Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > Since we have two productions, one for foreign import and one > for foreign export, let's separate the productions for "entity" into > "import_entity" and "export_entity". That way we don't have to > say "entity" in *both* 4.1 and 4.2.
Yes, I see your point. On the other hand, we'd have import_entity -> [String] export_entity -> [String] in the grammar in Section 3, then, and the introductory text to Section 4 would have to always mention both non-terminals. Nevertheless, I think, I tend to applying this change. Any other opinions? Cheers, Manuel _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
