> The questions that come up as I implement the ffi are mostly things
> that are not clear from the spec. This is a particularily good
> example of that - there's no example and the explanation is brief and
> open to many interpretations. I could hunt through the archives and
> guess at what the final decision was or I could ask for clarification
> so that we all agree on what change is needed to the report (or I look
> foolish when the appropriate section of the report is pointed out to
> me).
>
> In this case, all I could find was a brief discussion with no final
> conclusion. (Or maybe I missed the conclusion - the subject lines one
> the messages are fairly uninformative so I skimmed old mail fairly
> quickly.)
See these threads, for example:
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ffi/2001-February/000212.html
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ffi/2001-May/000345.html
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
FFI mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
