>> > That's a tricky one. From the standards point of view, I am > >> actually *very* reluctant to introduce new names. On the other > >> hand, reusing the old names will lead to a couple of unhappy emails >> > from people using the old interface again. >> >> But only a couple I conjecture.
> I read this as you would also (= like me) be in favour of keeping > the old names. Right? I'm not sure which position you're preferring here. I lean a bit towards using the old names for the new functions (the ones with free functions) and finding new names for the old functions (the ones with closure arguments). -- Alastair Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reid Consulting (UK) Limited http://www.reid-consulting-uk.ltd.uk/alastair/ _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
