Alastair Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > Manuel: > > In other words, it seem much more likely that one would > > partially apply `newForeignPtr' to a finaliser than to a > > pointer that is to be finalised. But this is a minor point. > > Having written some more ffi code over the last couple of days, I agree that > this is much more natural so, even though it will break all the packages I > released in the last week, I now vote for swapping the argument order.
This is the last outstanding issue. Shall we swap? I am torn. The swapped argument order seems more appropriate, but it will break code. Shall we have one more breakage before it's all frozen? Manuel _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
