Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Fergus Henderson wrote:
> > [...] the Haskell FFI has sacrificed quality for easy of implementation.
> > If this starts causing problems for users, I think the right solution
> > is to raise the bar for implementations, not to lower it. [...]
> P.S. to Malcolm: I did not mention nhc98, because I don't know how its
> back-end works, not because of an evil master plan against nhc98... :-)

S'okay.  nhc98's default backend always compiles via C, and therefore
FFI declarations that use macros will work in much the expected way
(I think).

FFI mailing list

Reply via email to