Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Fergus Henderson wrote: > > [...] the Haskell FFI has sacrificed quality for easy of implementation. > > If this starts causing problems for users, I think the right solution > > is to raise the bar for implementations, not to lower it. [...] > > P.S. to Malcolm: I did not mention nhc98, because I don't know how its > back-end works, not because of an evil master plan against nhc98... :-)
S'okay. nhc98's default backend always compiles via C, and therefore FFI declarations that use macros will work in much the expected way (I think). Regards, Malcolm _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi