This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

Git pushed a change to branch master
in repository ffmpeg.

    from 8bea614d98 avcodec/x86/sbcdsp: Avoid shift
     new 2dbcec5222 swscale/ops_dispatch: remove outdated comment
     new 670324675f swscale/uops: add extra convenience metadata for the 
backends
     new 17a9a59333 swscale/x86/ops: avoid direct reliance on `ops` metadata
     new 33d183a473 swscale/ops_dispatch: add SwsOpBackend.compile_uops()
     new bb553f9160 swscale/x86/ops: implement compile_uops()
     new b3a998699c swscale/x86/ops: add micro-op dump to compile_uops_x86() as 
well
     new 44e1b60c6a swscale/uops: consolidate SWS_UOP_{PERMUTE,COPY,MOVE}
     new 909ca1d7ce swscale/x86/ops: add missing non-FMA SWS_UOP_LINEAR fallback
     new e65dab2b59 swscale/tests/sws_ops: rewrite to test uops directly
     new 150f7d15df swscale/uops_macros_gen: drop checkasm planar write hack

The 10 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails.  The revisions
listed as "add" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.


Summary of changes:
 libswscale/ops_dispatch.h        |   9 +-
 libswscale/uops.c                |  98 ++----
 libswscale/uops.h                |  21 +-
 libswscale/uops_backend.c        |  40 ++-
 libswscale/uops_list.h           |   1 -
 libswscale/uops_macros.h         | 472 ++++++++++----------------
 libswscale/uops_macros_gen.c     |  35 +-
 libswscale/uops_tmpl.c           |  72 ++--
 libswscale/x86/ops.c             | 119 ++++---
 libswscale/x86/ops_float.asm     |   5 +
 libswscale/x86/ops_int.asm       |   3 +-
 libswscale/x86/uops_macros.asm.h |   4 +-
 tests/checkasm/sw_ops.c          | 707 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 tests/ref/fate/sws-ops-list      |   2 +-
 14 files changed, 672 insertions(+), 916 deletions(-)

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to