On 7/13/2014 5:54 PM, Lukasz Marek wrote: > You also ignored the case where user might have no access to shell at > all to mount remote fs.
That's a pretty damn specialized case. > Also, I wouldn't like a player (or anything else) mount anything under > carpet on my workstation. Case when I'm forced to do it (when possible) > is a step backward. Yes but all the players *already* have SMB support more or less, which is where it would belongs IMO. > IMHO This discussion is like, lets not to add new codec to ffmpeg, user > may transcode file with libav for example and use it this way. You just > insist that there is just one way to do something and don't give any > other option. Maybe we should just mail samba developers to remove that > library, because it is not needed. Just my opinion. Not really. I already thought adding stuff like FTP and Gopher to libav*format* was out-of-scope and retarded for that library. It does not seem like the proper place to do such access (proper being implementing an read/seek/whatever callback for AVIO, which you can do even Today™). I'm not going to do something as silly as block this patch, I'm just stating I think the design decision is a poor one. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
