On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 11:59:20 -0700 Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote:
> Two, the security team has already said that FFmpeg is not just "one > more package," and that no, they can't handle the substantial > incremental load from adding FFmpeg without removing libav. You may > be leery for a while. To change that impression, FFmpeg is going to > have to substantially improve on its past security track record and > then *maintain* that new level of security for some period of time. > Note that all of the above statements also apply to libav. As near > as I can tell, this is not a distinguishing characteristic between > the two projects. ah, you dusted off the classic debian mplayer rejection reason! from 2003 even! http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/9519 nice to see debian hasnt changed. -compn _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel