On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 02:15:45AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:47:59PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:16:12PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > > > I was thinking about if we should put an > > > automatic 50 USD bounty on every bug thats open since more than > > > 12 month on trac, and limited to the first 20 claims so its limited > > > to 1000 USD max expenses for us (for now) > > > (also limited to real unique bugs of course) > > > > What about the votes instead of time? > > > > https://trac.ffmpeg.org/report/11 > > iam fine with any rating, no preferrance here but votes can be > manipulated, time is alot harder though we shouldnt try to fix an > issue where theres no issue. We could still switch to time when > someone tries to manipulate the votes, if that ever happens ... >
In that case, maybe we (any recent ff developer) could just discuss in a committee which bugs should be rewarded (with the help of the votes or not). If it's like 10-15 bugs/reward to decide per year, I think we can handle that. For instance, Stefano was willing to work again on DVD input but sponsored would help here. I support that initiative since it's a blocker for replacing mencoder. In the same spirit, #2391 (VobSub support) is regularly requested. Nicolas could probably work on it, but given how hellish this can be, I think it might be a good idea to propose some remuneration as a motivator. Anyway, this tends to look like a bit like what ffmtech propose... And as you asked initially, this might not be compatible with SPI anyway. -- Clément B.
pgpiJwzdo_pMG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel