On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:30:14 +0200 Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:53:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:33:48 -0400 > > Reinhard Tartler <siret...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> > > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > > >> >> Hi, > > > >> >> > > > >> >> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port > > > >> >> libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not > > > >> >> test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at > > > >> >> least I got it to build. > > > >> > > > > >> > you could try to test by buiding ffmpeg as a whole but disable asm > > > >> > everywhere except libpostproc > > > >> > that might allow "easy" testing though fate or ffmpeg with > > > >> > libavfilter > > > >> > > > >> Is http://git.videolan.org/?p=libpostproc.git still maintained? > > > > > > > > AFAIK, no, it seems the last commit is 2 years ago > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> The Debian package tracks that repository, and ideally we could > > > >> collect the postproc patches there. > > > > > > > > libpostproc was and is maintained in > > > > git://source.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.git > > > > > > So the promise given in > > > https://lists.libav.org/pipermail/libav-devel/2012-February/020712.html > > > doesn't hold anymore? > > > > > > Any chance to make you reconsider reviving the standalone libpostproc.git? > > > > Yes, let me add my protest against this bullshit of still maintaining > > libpostproc as part of ffmpeg.git in FFmpeg. > > Can you elaborate / explain why 14496-2 Part 2: Visual Annex F.3 > "Postprocessing for Coding Noise Reduction" > (which is about half of what libpostproc is) > > Aka a part of the implementation of the MPEG4 ASP video specification > is insane to maintain in the same git repository as the > MPEG4 ASP video decoder and encoder ? Even if it somehow implements part of that spec, the decoders don't actually use libpostproc. I don't know anyone except you and maybe some MPlayer+FFmpeg devs who consider libpostproc an important component. And in general, it's a good idea to move optional libraries out of ffmpeg.git. (In fact, ffmpeg.git should be split into several git repos, one for each lib.) > > Iam not saying iam against it, just that it seems very strange to me > > If people want we could revive libpostproc.git, it just seemed easier > to me if people use libpostproc from FFmpeg > > [...] Feel free to create your own separate libpostproc git repo based on ffmpeg. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel