On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:16 AM, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14/09/14 9:38 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 08:47:11PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> > >> --- > > > > should be ok > > Pushed. Thanks. > > > > > > >> This should have been done before 2.4 was cut since the two files are > pretty much > >> bloat in the tar file now. > > > >> We can still cherry pick this for 2.4.1, though. > > > > removing a header is not ok in a point release, even if its a empty > > header, it could break build of an application > > It's not an installed header, but i guess applications that compile ffmpeg > straight > from the tree could be potentially affected. > > Applications that use private headers are doing so at their own risk, we change those around without thinking about compat all the time. This shouldn't block anything. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
