On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>
about the patchset as a whole, not specifically this one
we should check if theres any software left around that still uses
the symbols before removing the code completely and if so consider
to reintroduce them in a 2.4.1 while removing whats unused
Pushed the three you reviewed since either no code depended on them, or in the
OpenCL case it's an API that nobody has ever been able to use anyway.
I'm not exactly interested in looking around to see if any of this deprecated
stuff is still used. And IMO reintroducing them in a point release is quite
ugly.
An exception could be FF_API_DRAWTEXT_OLD_TIMELINE since as Clément pointed in
another email might be needed to remain compatible with libav.
probably you only have to wait, as i suspect andreas (in CC) will
test building all dependant packages in debian against 2.4
You're right that I'm currently rebuilding those against 2.4, but I
don't expect any problems there, since I already have rebuilt them
against a git snapshot about two weeks ago and didn't notice anything
problematic.
Best regards,
Andreas
PS: FFmpeg is probably going to be accepted into Debian experimental
real soon now.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
