On 21.10.2014 08:59, James Almer wrote:
On 20/10/14 5:03 PM, Lukasz Marek wrote:
On 20.10.2014 14:55, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:14:14PM +0200, Lukasz Marek wrote:
On 20 October 2014 08:47, Reimar Döffinger <reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de> wrote:

On 19.10.2014, at 13:39, Lukasz Marek <lukasz.m.lu...@gmail.com> wrote:

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Marek <lukasz.m.lu...@gmail.com>
---
libavdevice/libavdevice.v | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libavdevice/libavdevice.v b/libavdevice/libavdevice.v
index 663af85..d7c86ba 100644
--- a/libavdevice/libavdevice.v
+++ b/libavdevice/libavdevice.v
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
LIBAVDEVICE_$MAJOR {
-        global: avdevice_*;
+        global: av*;

I'd prefer if we'd keep the explicit _ termination and explicitly list all
prefixes that get exported.
I admit that luckily av is uncommon in English to start a word so it
probably won't matter much though.


I checked libavformat and libavcodec and they export av*, but I agree in
general so I have changed according to your suggestion.

   libavdevice.v |    2 +-
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
5722720606edb454d2b64edb06299b1a37099827  
0001-lavd-export-all-symbols-with-av_-prefix.patch
  From ea5b124b9eac8a4e07f41860fba646c6bc55f5bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukasz Marek <lukasz.m.lu...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:12:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] lavd: export all symbols with av_ prefix

LGTM

Pushed.

Should this be backported to ffmpeg 2.2 and 2.3? The four av_ functions 
declared in avdevice.h
were never exposed before this.

Only to 2.3 (these symbols are not present in 2.2)
Michael, could you backport it?

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to