On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:48:55PM +0000, Kevin Wheatley wrote: > Here is the kind of thing that this looks like... This is definitely > NOT a patch :-)
i dont understand this patch please explain why you use vos_data it can be the first packet and you seem to implement that case but it is not always the first packet and you seem to add alot of code to handle this. But if the data is in the dnxhd packets using that always and not vos_data seems much easier what am i missing ? or one could ask the other way around why vos data is set inconsistently, is there a case where setting it to the first packet does not work? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. -- Plato
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
