On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 04:49:49PM +0530, Gautam Ramakrishnan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:13 PM Michael Niedermayer
> <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:12:04AM +0530, gautamr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Gautam Ramakrishnan <gautamr...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > This patch removes a check which throws an error if
> > > the log2 precinct width/height is 0. The standard allows
> > > the first component to have 0 as the log2 width/height.
> > > ---
> > > libavcodec/jpeg2000.c | 3 ---
> > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/libavcodec/jpeg2000.c b/libavcodec/jpeg2000.c
> > > index 73206d17f3..1aca31ffa4 100644
> > > --- a/libavcodec/jpeg2000.c
> > > +++ b/libavcodec/jpeg2000.c
> > > @@ -509,9 +509,6 @@ int ff_jpeg2000_init_component(Jpeg2000Component
> > > *comp,
> > > // update precincts size: 2^n value
> > > reslevel->log2_prec_width =
> > > codsty->log2_prec_widths[reslevelno];
> > > reslevel->log2_prec_height =
> > > codsty->log2_prec_heights[reslevelno];
> > > - if (!reslevel->log2_prec_width || !reslevel->log2_prec_height) {
> > > - return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
> > > - }
> >
> > This checked that log2_prec_width... has been initialized.
> > Is there some other check that ensures this is not just 0 from allocation
> > which IIUC is not an allowed path in the spec
>
> A check happens only when the COD and COC marker gets read.is there a check that protects against the absence of these markers ? thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Asymptotically faster algorithms should always be preferred if you have asymptotical amounts of data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
