Hi, 2015-03-12 16:29 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at>: > from "(mx >> 2) << pixel_shift)" a compiler could imply that > (mx >> 2) is >= 0 as the alterantive is undefined
Well, (mvx >> 2) is implementation-defined, according to 6.5.7. But gcc produces the same instruction, so... -- Christophe _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
