On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:43 PM Wonkap Jang <won...@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:48 AM James Zern <jz...@google.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:24 AM Wonkap Jang <won...@google.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi James >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:18 AM Wonkap Jang <won...@google.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> In order to fine-control referencing schemes in VP9 encoding, there >> >> is a need to use VP9E_SET_SVC_REF_FRAME_CONFIG method. This commit >> >> provides a way to use the API through frame metadata. >> >> --- >> >> doc/encoders.texi | 32 +++++++++++++++++ >> >> libavcodec/libvpxenc.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> 2 files changed, 113 insertions(+) >> >> >> > [...] >> > In reply to your comment about using ABI_VERSION for guarding the changes, >> > the reason I used the unrelated >> > "VPX_CTRL_VP9E_SET_MAX_INTER_BITRATE_PCT" is because the ABI_VERION did >> > not seem to have changed between the last commit that you suggested >> > (v1.7.0-936-g04b3d49ba) to use and the lateset libvpx version. Can you >> > confirm this? >> > >> >> I think I may have mentioned, this doesn't have to be precise. You can >> just make 1.8.0 the baseline. >> Also it looks like you might have some syntax errors in encoders.texi. >> If you have the prerequisites, make doc can test the file locally. >> https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20201215171825.2598712-1-won...@google.com/ > > > Hi James, > > Maybe my local setup has outdated codebase for the doc changes...weird > because it is building without any problems... I even checked it with > "texi2html" tool. > I'll try to fix the doc compile issue. But, I don't quite get what you mean > by "just make 1.8.0 the baseline". > What I was trying to get to was the fact that you wanted me to use > VPX_ENCODER_ABI_VERSION instead of VPX_CTRL_VP9E_SET_MAX_INTER_BITRATE_PCT. > But, what I see is that VPX_ENCODER_ABI_VERSION has not changed even in the > latest codebase. Are you suggesting something else by saying "just make 1.8.0 > the baseline"? > Is there something I am missing? :) >
It's possible I misread your earlier replies. I see what you mean, the abi version hasn't changed at all since then, though it should have. It will change in the next release, but this check is ok. We have some similar variants already. > Let me know, > > Thanks!! > > Wonkap _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
