Before you do, just give it a crack locally.
I couldn't get the cloned version of the site to look identical to what's already published (something to do with
incorrect CSS symlinks iirc). It's probably fine, but for something like this I'd rather err on the side of caution.
Zane
On 8/3/21 11:24 pm, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
Am 24.02.21 um 17:53 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
Am 24.02.21 um 05:06 schrieb Zane van Iperen:
As per discussion at [1]. Patches attached.
Patch 1/3 adds /node_modules/ to .gitignore
Patch 2/3 adds the actual key and verification instructions
Patch 3/3 adds a prominent download link for the public key.
This might be bit obnoxious, but it was suggested in the original discussion.
[1]: https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2021-February/276752.html
As in [1] above I like that idea. However, I can't really comment on the
technical side of keys and signatures. So proper someones opinion with actual
knowledge would be appreciated.
If there are no complains, I'll push that soon (tm).
-Thilo
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
