On 09.04.2015 13:50, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
On 9 April 2015 at 12:17, Rodger Combs <rodger.co...@gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed, this belongs in a higher layer. I think it'd be reasonable for FFmpeg
to have a higher-layer library handling things like playlists and this, but
that's another conversation.
+1
So instead of complaining and spamming with "+1", prepare a patch and
submit it? Community will discuss it and do what's the best for the
project (and yes, project is not single person who has their wishes).
Personally I woulnt complain about that separation if done properly, but
just don't see a reason for it. Most of the stuff you don't need/like
you can disable at compilation level.
We have separation libavformat/libavdevice and most of patches I
submitted regarding libavdevice were complained by one person.
Sometimes I have a feeling that ffmpeg is an open source project to feed
wm4's project. Everything he doesn't need is "retarded", "rotten",
"dumb", etc, etc.
I don't want to be drama queen here, but the way author of this patch
was treated is bellow any level of dignity. FFmpeg has more to offer
that show how many douches is subscribed to the mailing list.
Unless these things are handled don't treat me as member of this
"community" anymore.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
