Paul Buxton (12021-08-15): > I have my filter working nicely but it is a little slow. I have > parallelised it where possible, but it is still a bit heavy. I am wondering > if there are any optimised implementations/approximations of some math > functions built in that I should use instead of the standard library > implementations. > Specifically any of > pow() > exp() > log() > > I have done a quick grep of the code but can't see any likely contenders.
I am not aware we have those. The kind of optimization you can do depends a lot on your use case. Please give a little details. If you want to speed your filter up, the best would be to make it work with integers. It would also allow to make reliable unit tests. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
