Paul B Mahol (12021-09-12): > Why purely input-driven scheme is wanted/needed to be supported?
Consider this:
input -----> scale -----> sink
If you add frames to the input, they will reach the sink. It can even be
something else than a buffersink and still work. No need to request a
frame on the sink.
OTOH:
input -----> vstack -----> sink
/
testsrc --/
If you add frames to the input, they will accumulate in the link before
vstack, because no frame will be requested from the sink.
I think I forgot one rule for filters with multiple inputs: having
enough frames on one input should be considered a sign output is wanted,
and trigger requesting frames on other outputs.
But I am not 100% sure I did not already consider this and discard it
for a reason I forgot, so I need to think about it.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
