On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 11:32 AM Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 22 Dec 2021, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 4:38 AM Tomas Härdin <tjop...@acc.umu.se> wrote: > >> > >> tis 2021-12-21 klockan 21:24 +0100 skrev Marton Balint: > >> > > >> > > >> > It is not matter of performance, we should not introduce a hack such > >> > as > >> > reordering PCM channels in a demuxer if there is a better solution on > >> > the > >> > horizon. > > > > Yes, it feels like channel reordering should be a framework-level > > feature and not a per-demuxer feature. > > > > What about a roadmap where the channel-reordering-in-MXF patch is > > scheduled to be merged after some reasonable time (1 month?) if the > > channel API has not landed by then? This would allow contributors and > > users to plan ahead. > > I am not sure, if 1 month is enough for things to settle. > > Anyway, I have sent a patch which has MCA info but without reordering. We > could merge that now, and later, when the API is in place, add support for > non-native channel ordering.
Sounds good to me. I have made two minor suggestions on the proposed patch. > > Regards, > Marton > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".