On 12.05.2015 11:17, wm4 wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2015 23:34:32 +0200 > Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> @@ -109,7 +108,7 @@ static int decode_packet(int *got_frame, int cached) >> pix_fmt, width, height); >> >> /* write to rawvideo file */ >> - fwrite(video_dst_data[0], 1, video_dst_bufsize, video_dst_file); >> + fwrite(video_dst_data[0], 1, video_dst_linesize[0] * height, >> video_dst_file); > > This would still write the line padding to the file, wouldn't it?
It wouldn't, because the video_dst_data buffer has no line padding. (That's the only purpose of this buffer, see the comment above av_image_copy.) > This > means it wouldn't write the full frame, _and_ each line would have > garbage at the end of it. > > (Also I can't make sense of these examples...) This one is quite useful for fuzzing, because it has much less overhead than ffmpeg. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
