On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:01:03PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: [...] > > If we add a XML parser to FFmpeg. Such a thing would be used by several > > bits and we need to ensure it has redundant maintainership. > > So i think a xml parser needs broad support by developers otherwise we > > run the risk that if it has a single maintainer only and that maintainer > > stops maintaining it that could be annoying to more than just the parser > > itself. > > I cannot remember exactly without re-reading the old thread what the issues > > people had with the xml parser. If it was some component of it or in > > general. > > But i think its mostly a question if theres more than one person who wants > > to maintain it. > > There is nothing to re-read: > > https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-May/thread.html#296107 > > Nobody answered. Even to send files to make sure they would be > supported.
that says "WIP" in the subject. I think some people when they see WIP they skip it and wait for a final version to review. thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The real ebay dictionary, page 2 "100% positive feedback" - "All either got their money back or didnt complain" "Best seller ever, very honest" - "Seller refunded buyer after failed scam"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
