Hi Ronald, On 07.06.2015 19:37, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun < > andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> On 07.06.2015 17:52, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >>> We can't simply claim that 8k is not a valid dimension, that would make us >>> a vp8-incompatible decoder if vp8 stream dimensions are allowed to be >>> 8k. >>> This could particularly happen in images (webp). >> >> I'd change the error to AVERROR_PATCHWELCOME as Michael suggested, so feel >> free to fix this limitation. ;) > > > No, no, not so easy. For example, keyframes (like webp) would decode just > fine even thougb mvmin/max is broken, so we're causing a regression here of > something that worked fine before.
Hmm, so maybe the check could be moved to decode_mb_row_no_filter? > Is this an actual bug? What is the behaviour that you're trying to fix? Is > this some overflow noticed on some generated/fuzzed bitstream with > -fsanitize=integer? Or are we decoding a sample differently from libvpx? Or > something else? The overflow of mv_max can cause it to be smaller than mv_min, which causes av_clip to abort for ASSERT_LEVEL >= 2. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel