Mark Gaiser (12022-12-28): > > Ok, that made me laugh :) I did not write that. And that feels rude.
> Please correct me as I'm probably wrong. > But where did anyone say that there was a working alternative solution that > did not require customizing how ffmpeg is used? > Like disabling safe. Heuristics to not require safe in cases where it is quite safe would be much more acceptable than a redundant ad-hoc format. -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
